The emergence of \(USUAL, a new cryptocurrency project aiming to rival Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC) in the stablecoin market, has sparked considerable debate. This article delves deeper into the potential implications of \)USUAL, exploring its ambitious goals, inherent risks, and the intriguing possibility of its being a strategic move by the US government to exert greater control over global cryptocurrency capital flows.
The author posits that \(USUAL's success could result in a trillion-dollar market capitalization, potentially eclipsing Tether and Circle and capturing a significant portion of their market share. This presents enormous potential gains, but also considerable risks. The article references key elements from the \)USUAL whitepaper, highlighting its token release mechanism and contrasting it with those of other similar projects. A critical comparison is drawn with the SCR project, noting discrepancies between promised and actual launchpool token distributions, raising concerns about the transparency and potential risks associated with $USUAL.
The article also emphasizes the fact that neither Tether nor Circle are publicly listed companies, a point of contrast with \(USUAL (assuming it pursues a more transparent path). This lack of transparency in the established players creates an opening for a new entrant like \)USUAL. However, the article cautions that the potential for similar issues to those seen in SCR cannot be discounted. The author suggests that the promise of significantly greater returns from $USUAL could be alluring but carries the same risks, if not greater, inherent in the volatile world of cryptocurrencies.
The underlying question explored is whether \(USUAL is a genuinely disruptive innovation or a tool for geopolitical maneuvering. The author speculates that its rise might represent a calculated US attempt to influence and manage the global flow of cryptocurrency funds. This speculative geopolitical angle adds another layer of complexity to the assessment of \)USUAL’s potential. The article concludes with a personal anecdote from the author’s investment experience, underscoring the inherent high-risk nature of cryptocurrency investments, ultimately framing $USUAL as both a potentially revolutionary force and a highly speculative venture.